Psychologist (M.Sc. Hons, University of Amsterdam) with seven years of clinical research experience across oncology, palliative care, and public health. Specialising in patient-centred outcomes, psychometric validation, and clinical data science. PhD candidate at the University of Bonn, Faculty of Medicine (Epidemiology): machine-learning prediction of quality of life after childhood cancer.
I have published on COA instrument harmonisation — linking paediatric and adult patient-reported outcome measures in an international osteosarcoma cohort (European Journal of Cancer, 2022) — and have a manuscript in preparation on non-response prediction in childhood cancer survivor surveys using machine learning.
On the applied side, I build R Shiny tools that make complex statistical methodology accessible to clinical researchers, including a psychometric analysis tool for IRT-based item fit evaluation and a dashboard developed for the Lancet Commission on Palliative Care and Pain Relief.
Download my CV.
PhD Candidate in Epidemiology (expected completion: 2027)
University of Bonn, Germany
MSc in Psychology (With Honours), 2004
University of Amsterdam (UvA), The Netherlands
Diploma in Criminal Science, 1997
University of Pau and Adour Countries (UPPA), Pau, France
Evaluating the practical significance of item misfit in psychological and educational tests (axelbudde.shinyapps.io/FUNForFit)
Global visualisation of Serious Health-Related Suffering (SHS) burden data (Live dashboard) – developed for the Lancet Commission on Palliative Care and Pain Relief
Commercial freemium SaaS application for airline fare routing rule analysis (routingruler.com)
Lectures in Psychology degree programme (B.Sc.):
Development of R Shiny app for visualisation of Serious Health Related Suffering (SHS):
Coordination of project “E-Surv” (Funding: German Cancer Aid):
Graduate programme “Epidemiological Research Using Cancer Registry Data” (German Cancer Aid):
Developed R Shiny apps:
Programming
Outcomes Research & Psychometrics
Statistics & Data Science
Documentation & Reporting
Cloud & Deployment
Additional Tools

Purpose The available questionnaires for quality-of-life (QoL) assessments are age-group specific, limiting comparability and impeding longitudinal analyses. The comparability of measurements, however, is a necessary condition for gaining scientific evidence. To overcome this problem, we assessed the viability of harmonising data from paediatric and adult patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Method To this end, we linked physical functioning scores from the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and the Paediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PEDQOL) to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) for adults. Samples from the EURAMOS-1 QoL sub-study of 75 (PedsQL) and 112 (PEDQOL) adolescent osteosarcoma patients were concurrently administered both paediatric and adult questionnaires on 98 (PedsQL) and 156 (PEDQOL) occasions. We identified corresponding scores using the single-group equipercentile linking method. Results Linked physical functioning scores showed sufficient concordance to the EORTC QLQ-C30: Lin’s ρ = 0.74 (PedsQL) and Lin’s ρ = 0.64 (PEDQOL). Conclusion Score linking provides clinicians and researchers with a common metric for assessing QoL with PRO measures across the entire lifespan of patients.